Analysis

Choose an election:

This form allows to compare several rules for Participatory Budgeting. Each rule can be considered in four variants, depending on the utility interpretation of voters' ballots and the way how given rule is applied to given city.
(1) cost vs. score utilities: This option indicates whether a rule should favor electing fewer expensive projects (cost utilities) over electing more cheap ones (score utilities). [Show details]
(2) districtwise vs. citywide: Most cities are divided into several districts. This option indicates whether a rule should be run separately in each district or jointly in the whole city.

Please select the base rule, to which the others would be compared. The rule currently used by all the cities is Utilitarian Greedy, districtwise, cost utilities.

Base rule:

Now please select the remaining rules. Under the Utilitarian Greedy rule the projects are ordered by decreasing order of support divided by project cost and selected one-by-one until the budget is full. The remaining methods are Phragmen's Sequential Rule and multiple variants of the Method of Equal Shares.

Equal Shares (Add1 + Utilitarian Greedy):
Equal Shares (Add1):
Equal Shares (Epsilon cost utilities):
Equal Shares (Epsilon utilities):
Equal Shares (Phragmen):
Equal Shares (Utilitarian Greedy):
Equal Shares (no completion):
Phragmen:
Utilitarian Greedy:

Calculating statistics. Please wait...